|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 20 posts ] |
|
|
Neso
|
Posted: Tue, Mar 23 2010, 20:23 PM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 03 Mar 2007
|
|
I noticed that Implosion has been modified to have a DC of 3 less on Amia. I think it would be a good idea to add it to the list of modified spells.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
MadrikVale
|
Posted: Tue, Mar 23 2010, 20:27 PM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 14 May 2009 Location: Evanston, Wyoming
|
|
Careful, now. *glare*
_________________ [color=#d0c0d0][i]"A quote someone made about how wonderful me or my character is." -Mr. No Thanks[/color][/i]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TormakSaber
|
Posted: Tue, Mar 23 2010, 21:21 PM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 16 Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere
|
|
More like it was modified to fix a bug, because Bioware for whatever inane reason gave Implosion a +3 DC for literally no reason, and anyone relying on that crutch is a bad, bad person that likes to exploit things.
_________________ Davion Telemos - Monk of the Four Winds Korthan Isharnos - Dragon Shaman of Thunder Spirit Zamasham
|
|
|
|
 |
|
762
|
Posted: Tue, Mar 23 2010, 22:39 PM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Location: Florida
|
|
Uh.
There are a LOT of spells that do not work the way they do in PnP. That doesn't make using them a bug exploit.
If it's changed from BioWare, it should be on the modifications page.
_________________ Araxus Balmor Gurth Balmor (retired)
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TormakSaber
|
Posted: Tue, Mar 23 2010, 23:24 PM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 16 Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere
|
|
Implosion doesn't have a +3 random Dc in PnP either. You missed my point.
_________________ Davion Telemos - Monk of the Four Winds Korthan Isharnos - Dragon Shaman of Thunder Spirit Zamasham
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Neso
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 2:22 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 03 Mar 2007
|
|
I don't even understand why there is a need for an argument or points to be made here. It has been established by the NWN community that the +3 DC for Implosion is no bug, but rather an intended change. Why they did it, nobody knows, but it was intended, hence it is no bug, and people are not exploiters. I only asked that it be clarified in the modified spells menu, since that is exactly what it is - a modified spell.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TormakSaber
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 2:45 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 16 Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere
|
|
Established by the NWN community? Which community?
The spell is AoE, defeats Death Ward, is a popular Cleric focus school. It does not nee d+3 DC for no reason especially when it goes against the rules for calculating spell DCs. Whoever at bioware coded it into the spell should be slapped with the PHB.
IMO it doesn't need to be listed because it was abugfix. The spell works properly as can be expected with the standard spell DC rules of NWN.
_________________ Davion Telemos - Monk of the Four Winds Korthan Isharnos - Dragon Shaman of Thunder Spirit Zamasham
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Iteries
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 3:05 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Location: Are you ready to be a true Role Player?
|
TormakSaber wrote: Established by the NWN community? Which community.
This Bioware NWN community : http://nwn.bioware.com/forums
Not flaming but you asked.
_________________ ~~~~~Active Character's ~~~~~ Edonil Carter ~War Knight~
"Builders are the Stage Mangers. Game Master's are the Directors to guide the story along. Characters are the Actors. All together they make Role Playing Story's come alive."
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Neso
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 3:12 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 03 Mar 2007
|
|
Why are you so opposed to informing people? There is no harm in it what so ever. The spell was modified from how it originally works in the game, and people should get to know. Or is it just that you want to screw the "exploiters" over and have them find out the hard way? Not very mature.
Seriously, this is a no-brainer. I didn't even expect replies here, I just expected it to be done. I don't see what the big deal is.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
blackvswhite
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 3:15 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 08 Nov 2008
|
|
the side bar has been/always will be extremely outdated.... give it a few months for the extra bit of text to be copy/pasted over
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Yurell
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 3:26 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Location: ANU, behind the coffee mug (+10 GMT)
|
http://nwn.wikia.com/wiki/Implosion
"This spell's DC is increased by +3. Some players consider this a bug, but it seems clear from the spell script that it is an intentional change. "
_________________ 2009's Second Most Overall Contributing Player
يمكنني استخدام مترجم جوجل
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TormakSaber
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 3:50 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 16 Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere
|
|
According to the calculations for spell DC, it is a bug, an inconsistency, and there is nothing in either the spell description nor the PnP translation that impliees it should recieve a DC boost.
Ergo, bugfix. Consistency for everyone.
_________________ Davion Telemos - Monk of the Four Winds Korthan Isharnos - Dragon Shaman of Thunder Spirit Zamasham
|
|
|
|
 |
|
msheeler
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 4:24 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 17 Dec 2008 Location: eastern USA
|
blackvswhite wrote: the side bar has been/always will be extremely outdated.... give it a few months for the extra bit of text to be copy/pasted over
I'll second this.. there is a lot that doesn't do what you might normaly expect the NWN game engine to do and won't readily find on the forums. My best advice is to either be willing to experiment, or ask around for advice on the build thread.
For me the saveing grace is now the quarterly rebuild the nice staff here lets us have.... FREE DO-OVERS! just incase you made a mistake, or found that perhaps something else would have made more sence for RP purpose.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Yurell
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 4:48 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Location: ANU, behind the coffee mug (+10 GMT)
|
|
I can't see why it's not added to the sidebar.
It would save threads like this, and it wouldn't exactly hurt. Just a little note edited into one post. There's really no reason to dig one's heels in, considering how easy it is to add the note.
_________________ 2009's Second Most Overall Contributing Player
يمكنني استخدام مترجم جوجل
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TormakSaber
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 4:51 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 16 Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere
|
|
Talk to Maias then. Last I knew all those rewrites were his job.
_________________ Davion Telemos - Monk of the Four Winds Korthan Isharnos - Dragon Shaman of Thunder Spirit Zamasham
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Yurell
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 4:52 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Location: ANU, behind the coffee mug (+10 GMT)
|
|
I thought any DM could edit the post? And can I ask why Maias, when Disco was the one who made the post?
_________________ 2009's Second Most Overall Contributing Player
يمكنني استخدام مترجم جوجل
|
|
|
|
 |
|
MadrikVale
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 5:09 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 14 May 2009 Location: Evanston, Wyoming
|
It doesn't matter. We don't play NWN anyway. We play Amia
Where's the lock button? *searches*
_________________ [color=#d0c0d0][i]"A quote someone made about how wonderful me or my character is." -Mr. No Thanks[/color][/i]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TormakSaber
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 5:19 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 16 Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere
|
Yurell wrote: I thought any DM could edit the post? And can I ask why Maias, when Disco was the one who made the post?
Because, again AFAIK, Maias was the one who volunteered to rewrite them all to add everything and make it up to date.
_________________ Davion Telemos - Monk of the Four Winds Korthan Isharnos - Dragon Shaman of Thunder Spirit Zamasham
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Yurell
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 5:44 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 06 Jan 2008 Location: ANU, behind the coffee mug (+10 GMT)
|
|
Cheers, I'll PM him.
_________________ 2009's Second Most Overall Contributing Player
يمكنني استخدام مترجم جوجل
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Maias227
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 24 2010, 7:25 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 08 Jun 2007 Location: Denmark (GMT+1)
|
|
Adding it now and yep I were voulenteered to keep track of the spells and such. And thus pm me if belive any changes are missing and I'll look into it.
_________________ ...Hereof follows that the social contract is only beneficial as long as all have something and none have too much...
- Rousseau Book 1 Chapter 9 in "The Social Contract"
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 20 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|