AMIA ARCHIVE • View topic

I am looking for a person who lives or plays within GMT +8 timezone. (evenings) to play a slave. As per the slave rules on amia (They can be any time zone so long as they play regular hours similar to my own so there is no problems scheduling RP)

http://www.amiaworld.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1123257#p1123257

My Main Valkin is intending on purchasing one from the slave markets in Underport. A young human female, I dont wish to give much away as to the intent of the rp. But ultimately he intends to have a child beyond that who knows. The slave will ultimately be under valkins thumb as per the slave rules. But i am hoping for a lot of interesting rp pertaining to building trust and a pseudo-relationship. "sex" is implied but i am not ok with anything ... sus i am more than happy with the good old fade to black. It should be noted that i may enforce perma-death of the slave under certain conditions.

The character should not be played unless i am online or some kind of arrangement has been maid and would be subject to being "locked up" for long periods of time. Safe to say the slave will be part of a ongoing research project that has spanned years and will be involved in the final ritual of such. I hope there is someone out there that is keen enough to play a slave pc, you can design them if you desire it, but valkin would be looking for someone with little fight who appears lost and solemn due to slavery and ill treatment.

*Note: as some have raised dispute, it should be noted that despite the "rules" on slaves, what happens in game happens. Although valkin has intent i am simply along for the ride.

must it be a female?

Because that is clearly the slave the character is purchasing. If you read his post, it makes sense. Not only that, but if you are not intending to play the character, why do you care about the exacting circumstances Valkin looks for in a slave and therefore requires in a player?

TormakSaber wrote:

Because that is clearly the slave the character is purchasing. If you read his post, it makes sense. Not only that, but if you are not intending to play the character, why do you care about the exacting circumstances Valkin looks for in a slave and therefore requires in a player?

There's a follow up question to it which i intended to state whether the response was fitting or not, I'm not one for playing Females y'see. Don't go and be a snide jerk...
My question is my own and it's entirely legitimate.

Edit - And it was suppose to say "Must it be a female". Edited accordingly.

Quote:

But ultimately he intends to have a child beyond that who knows.

Seeming that generally a womb is required for humanoid conception i would say that yes a female is necessary yes. I am not asking for anything "weird" just a female character, preferably human. As valkin may have a little distaste in other races lol That said i dont really appreciate the thread being turned into anything it is not. So i would greatly appreciate only serious questions & Serious interest in the slave pc.

Hokeydokey.

L2stepoutofcomfortzone, Svensk.

Bini wrote:

L2stepoutofcomfortzone, Svensk.

So you are interested in playing the slave pc then ?

If not dont post.

Make sure all the rules are observed. Not just the slave PC rules.

Nivo wrote:

Make sure all the rules are observed. Not just the slave PC rules.

*shivers* i dont want anything of the sort.... its purely research related

gods, if i wanted that id just go play on sinfar *snickers* its the cyber capital of NWN so i am told -.-

TaliaZalinNalla wrote:

Bini wrote:

L2stepoutofcomfortzone, Svensk.

So you are interested in playing the slave pc then ?

If not dont post.

My poke has no bearing on my own interest... In fact I've been mulling it over since you posted it elsewhere as I'm a sucker for punishment. My hang up is the ambiguity in regards to which of the number locations Valkin is involved in that the interaction between slave and (pale)master will take place, as I don't want to have it too close to another character of mine.

Bini wrote:

TaliaZalinNalla wrote:

Bini wrote:

L2stepoutofcomfortzone, Svensk.

So you are interested in playing the slave pc then ?

If not dont post.

My poke has no bearing on my own interest... In fact I've been mulling it over since you posted it elsewhere as I'm a sucker for punishment. My hang up is the ambiguity in regards to which of the number locations Valkin is involved in that the interaction between slave and (pale)master will take place, as I don't want to have it too close to another character of mine.

Ok, lets take this to a private channel, i will pm you with a little more info.

Mind that by stating "the slave will ultimately be destined for perma death" you fundamentally ruin good suspense and IC revelations. If this is a requirement for the player to make the character, you are simply wrong. A DM or the player will still retain the freedom to carry on playing the character as you don't have the right to dictate IC causation by other means than the influence of your character. If the eventual perma death is based on a mutual agreement between you and whoever winds up playing the slave PC, you just make the whole concept a huge yawn by eliminating the arbitrary consequences of RP. Making a script is one of the best ways to ruin PC interaction. I would be willing to play the character if the consequences thereof were totally obscure apart from the motivations of your character solely.

I cant explain anything really, as such really gives away what its all about. But the occ warning is really related to the new slave PC rules, as that the life of the slave is in the hands of the owner. That permadeath can be enforced at any time by said owner. I put it in to make it clear and so people examine the rules before accepting. I dont want disgruntle person spazing out when & if they die and i dont raise them. There is no script only what RP interactions will fold out, it is really a warning lol nothing more dont read into it so much. (most slaves die) lol

I agree with Opustus, but I personally I'd take what was outlined by Talia with a grain of salt, because the nature of roleplay is dynamic. Who knows, even Valkin has a heart. :wink:

Bini wrote:

I agree with Opustus, but I personally I'd take what was outlined by Talia with a grain of salt, because the nature of roleplay is dynamic. Who knows, even Valkin has a heart. :wink:

Yup. Its all just a disclaimer. i put it in there not to say "this will happen" but "this may happen". I will enjoy the outcomes and development of rp as much as success or failure its always been that way for me. despite some who think otherwise lol. Sure valkin wants what he wants, but im along for the ride.

TaliaZalinNalla wrote:

I cant explain anything really, as such really gives away what its all about. But the occ warning is really related to the new slave PC rules, as that the life of the slave is in the hands of the owner. That permadeath can be enforced at any time by said owner. I put it in to make it clear and so people examine the rules before accepting. I dont want disgruntle person spazing out when & if they die and i dont raise them. There is no script only what RP interactions will fold out, it is really a warning lol nothing more dont read into it so much. (most slaves die) lol

I wasn't aware of the rules at all, so I'm very sorry for the criticism that was apparently aimed at the rules. Say, if a group of happy paladins were to invade your lair for one reason or the other, and rescued your poor servant while at it, I think it would be ridiculous and unfair to annul the effects of RP just because the rules happen to say so. I don't understand these rules anyway. Under some circumstances, a slave could easily get hold of a knife or such. Why on earth cannot the slave level past CL2? What the hell?

I might be misinterpreting the rules, though. For example, all of this may be substantially to say that the slave is not at liberty to do any what is mentioned without the explicit permission and presence of the "master" PC. But still, it's ridiculous to treat a slave PC any different to a non-slave PC. This kind of a relationship naturally has to be founded on a mutual agreement, and therefore the players' mutual trust should be adequate to outline the rules of RP. What were these rules made for in the first place?

The rules are far from clear and the DMs didn't come to much of a conclusion, but here's what was said, some posts down the second page starting from Derk:

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=67594&start=50

http://www.amiaworld.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?p=1123257#p1123257

The rules are quoted from the "rules" section. However that said when... did i say i would nullify any IC consequences ? when did i say i would, if you read the rules upon slaves DM supervision can change the outcome. thus "attacking" my lair so to speak would require such. Thus lending to the approval of such RP. I already stated i welcome RP, i welcome whatever happens icly. This thread also is not to debate the rules if you feel so stronlgy upon such make another thread. However if you were so inclined to make a slave character and wish to discuss the "terms" of rp with me i am happy to do so.

These rules make playing a slave uneventful, reducing it into a foil rather than a proper character.

Uncle-Opustus wrote:

These rules make playing a slave uneventful, reducing it into a foil rather than a proper character.

I am sorry you feel that way, and on some level i can agree. But i am working within the system i have. If you are keen i am happy to discuss whatever terms. However if you are not, i would really appreciate it if the thread was not flooded with arguments about the rules. Its hard enough to keep threads on track as it is.

Please.. someone save me form this madness lol i have had one "offer" still in discussion as yet but the offers still stands.

Oh yeah, sorry, didn't realise I was derailing the topic. If Bini wants to be your bitch, by all means, take Bini. S/he's much better at it. :wink:

I haven't made any promises. In fact I'd prefer it were someone else to take a keen interest as I'd rather not know what Valkin is working on so my other characters are soupriced by it.

By all means, make a bitch of yourself, Opustus!

Okay, sent in my Bitch CV. Let's hope I suck more.

Weirdest personal add ever.

I have had a few PMS >.< yay thx all who were interested i will reply shortly.

Silent2001 wrote:

Weirdest personal add ever.

... -.-...

Anyhow... i found someone that is keen and suitable. If a DM could Lock this topic please to avoid further spam lol

Locking as requested.

Slave PC wanted.

Who is online