|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 15 posts ] |
|
|
Gobbledygook
|
Posted: Mon, Mar 26 2012, 3:09 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 18 Sep 2011
|
|
What creatures are typically classed as 'Monstrous'?
_________________ Just lurking about!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Gers
|
Posted: Mon, Mar 26 2012, 3:16 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 30 Apr 2005 Location: Kentucky, USA
|
|
Monstrous humanoids, such as gnolls, minotaurs, Rosie O'Donnell, etc.
_________________ Named Most Influential Character, Amia Awards 2011
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Liz
|
Posted: Mon, Mar 26 2012, 3:28 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 28 May 2010 Location: Smallville
|
Yeah, what Gers said. To clarify: "Monstrous Humanoid" is a mechanically defined creature type, like "Outsider" or "Giant" or "Dragon." Officially, they're "similar to humanoids, but with monstrous or animalistic features. They often have magical abilities as well." http://www.d20srd.org/srd/typesSubtypes.htm#monstrousHumanoidType
_________________ Winner of Amia's "Most Ethical Time Traveler" award 2026 Character Portraits!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Gobbledygook
|
Posted: Mon, Mar 26 2012, 5:05 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 18 Sep 2011
|
|
Thankyou!
_________________ Just lurking about!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
swe_west_coast
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 28 2012, 18:49 PM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
|
|
|
|
 |
|
DustSpray101
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 28 2012, 19:52 PM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 27 Jun 2008 Location: Night Vale
|
|
Better place for this.
_________________ Eli Hodgewall <{/,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~X Sven <=={o===========> Qeelak \ | / ,
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TormakSaber
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 28 2012, 21:08 PM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 16 Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere
|
|
Not at all. This is boring mechanics and has nothing to do with lore. I'm moving it back.
_________________ Davion Telemos - Monk of the Four Winds Korthan Isharnos - Dragon Shaman of Thunder Spirit Zamasham
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Tomato Sword
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 28 2012, 21:11 PM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 18 Aug 2011
|
Gers wrote: Monstrous humanoids, such as gnolls, minotaurs, Rosie O'Donnell, etc. ... What do you have against Rosie!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Bini
|
Posted: Wed, Mar 28 2012, 21:20 PM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 26 Mar 2011
|
 Tormak is being bluntly objective, as befits a DM. =3
_________________ feel the blood gushing from your anusONE feel the blood gushing from your anus
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Gunz
|
Posted: Thu, Mar 29 2012, 0:12 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 01 Jul 2006 Location: The City of Fallen Angels, Ca
|
swe_west_coast wrote: http://nwn.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Monstrous
If you're a ranger in Amia, I would suggest that you took some other race as favored enemy. That's not the best way to judge. Amia has custom built and custom skinned creatures of all types. That's only useful when looking at single player.
_________________ My Characters: Yuilith Kethil Menaiivan Garadeth
|
|
|
|
 |
|
swe_west_coast
|
Posted: Thu, Mar 29 2012, 8:05 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
|
Gunz wrote: That's not the best way to judge. Amia has custom built and custom skinned creatures of all types. That's only useful when looking at single player. Indeed you have, and it's very nice. But since I own one of very few level 30 pure rangers in Amia, I made that statement out of experience. Favored enemies become really useful from level 21 when you can take the bane of enemies feat. For that reason, if you want to make a powerful ranger, you got to see what you hunt in epic levels, and monstrous enemies are not that many compared to other races. I'm deliberately vague to not drop any spoilers here. I'm not saying that monstrous is a completely useless choice, I just say that there are other epic monster races and PvP hungry players with different races out there that might deserve the choice of "favored enemies" better.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
TormakSaber
|
Posted: Thu, Mar 29 2012, 9:37 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 16 Dec 2004 Location: Somewhere
|
|
Or maybe you could pick what your ranger would hunt and hate instead of building purely for mechanics.
_________________ Davion Telemos - Monk of the Four Winds Korthan Isharnos - Dragon Shaman of Thunder Spirit Zamasham
|
|
|
|
 |
|
IronAngel
|
Posted: Thu, Mar 29 2012, 10:04 AM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 29 Sep 2005 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
|
Furthermore, you get to pick plenty of favored enemies to accomodate some mechanical efficency without sacrificing your character concept. It's not an either-or choice. You will get by more than fine even if you start with some really strange and gimmicky Favored Enemies your concept involves.
_________________ On Joon, Kjetta wrote: The guy that probably has sexual fantasies about masturbation. I mean, Iron, you're a bookworm nerd that even in your wildest escapism fantasies flee to the internet to play the role of another bookworm nerd? Come on!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
swe_west_coast
|
Posted: Thu, Mar 29 2012, 17:14 PM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 19 Jan 2006
|
|
I wouldn't advice any ranger to be to take: beasts, construct, dragon, fey or shapechanger either, 'cause you can't have all races as favored enemies and those that are least useful must go, if you want to make a self sustained ranger. All of these races have some use but none are something I would classify as a good choice. Then, you can of course play a ranger in whatever way you want and don't think about favored enemies or anything that make rangers special, just like you can have a wizard with intelligence 8 or a fighter specialized in using fists to fight with. It's just different ways of playing NWN.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Gunz
|
Posted: Thu, Mar 29 2012, 17:17 PM |
|
|

Player
Joined: 01 Jul 2006 Location: The City of Fallen Angels, Ca
|
|
Thank you for telling people what to do to get a mechanical benefit in your eyes. I'm locking this since the answer was given to prevent further silly comments.
_________________ My Characters: Yuilith Kethil Menaiivan Garadeth
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 15 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum
|
|