(Removed as invalid now
)
| AMIA ARCHIVE https://www.amiaworld.net/phpBB3/ |
|
| (OOC) Mess :D https://www.amiaworld.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=53&t=57001 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | ---Embrace666--- [ Mon, Apr 04 2011, 15:57 PM ] |
| Post subject: | (OOC) Mess :D |
(Remove's post, and the shadowly lady wouldent have got escortid out as seeing the guard sporting her in HIPS she nod's and walks on by) |
|
| Author: | Mishy moo [ Mon, Apr 04 2011, 16:26 PM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (icly) On Ruin's Ofice Door |
(Removed as invalid now )
|
|
| Author: | TormakSaber [ Mon, Apr 04 2011, 20:41 PM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (icly) On Ruin's Ofice Door |
The slim shadowy lady appears to have failed to take into account that the guards don't actually really need to see or hear anything, and given that they are undead, do not really get "distracted", given how Tarkuul operates. She is forcibly escorted to the portal and off of the island the second she begins attempting to dig through and ruin the Captain's personal belongings and reports and thus does not have a chance to really perform her vandalism or steal anything. |
|
| Author: | ---Embrace666--- [ Mon, Apr 04 2011, 20:51 PM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (icly) On Ruin's Ofice Door |
// if you go to the office the guard is Down the hall Faceing away from the door and i did have oocly pomishon from ruin so i would know what was in his office, and i did do it ll icly with my char, but never mind, 
|
|
| Author: | Thryliss [ Mon, Apr 04 2011, 21:00 PM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (icly) On Ruin's Ofice Door |
Now Im curious. Is there an in depth layout or manual of Tarkul and undead there? lol Perhaps a monster manual. I would assume they would have some sort of aura or rune of sort installed in them to detect all motives or Spot checks, move silently etc.. Seems like you just dropped a Bomb on this RP and has made me see that one should, I guess try to contact a specific DM and ask of going about to do such a simple RP. |
|
| Author: | P Three [ Mon, Apr 04 2011, 21:31 PM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (icly) On Ruin's Ofice Door |
HiPSing is illegal in Tarkuul; looks like the Laws sticky got bombed out, probably should dig it up and replace it. IIRC (and I might not, so..) the city itself is aware of the actions of people within it. Its bond to the guards can direct them. Especially when things like the laws are concerned. |
|
| Author: | Mishy moo [ Mon, Apr 04 2011, 21:40 PM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (icly) On Ruin's Ofice Door |
AxlLeigh wrote: HiPSing is illegal in Tarkuul; looks like the Laws sticky got bombed out, probably should dig it up and replace it. IIRC (and I might not, so..) the city itself is aware of the actions of people within it. Its bond to the guards can direct them. Especially when things like the laws are concerned. // Yes, I remember it being the case that this was banned some years ago back when I played Gwen before she left the Guard. Haven't being sure if it was still in effect, would be nice to have some clarification on this. Good thing to bring up at the Guard meeting.
|
|
| Author: | Thryliss [ Mon, Apr 04 2011, 21:49 PM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (icly) On Ruin's Ofice Door |
Thank you for the info Also, since it is illegal..does that mean they can automatically catch you? Is there some sort of barrier of magic or something of sort that alarms instantly of HIPS? Its illegal to pick pockets of others in a city like Cordor..but does that mean you just get caught automatically? Btw that would be really cool RP layout of a ward or magic sense to catch HIPS or other things not allowed to be achievedAgain thanks for the info mates XD |
|
| Author: | Thryliss [ Mon, Apr 04 2011, 21:55 PM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (icly) On Ruin's Ofice Door |
Oops..Just saw the post above a bit and noted she stated the city is "aware" and can direct the guards..thats cool ..So in other words the walls have eyes even if the guards do not see such.. Very interesting A living sentient city! pretty cool |
|
| Author: | Mishy moo [ Mon, Apr 04 2011, 21:59 PM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (icly) On Ruin's Ofice Door |
There's a little bit of info on the Wiki page in the side bar under settlements, if that helps too.
|
|
| Author: | TormakSaber [ Mon, Apr 04 2011, 23:57 PM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (OOC) Mess :D |
HIPS is not banned. It's an untenably enforceable ban that would require 100% DM supervision 24/7 to enforce. I told this to the peopole who tried to enact it years ago. That said: You do not "distract" undead that are managed by an Overmind. Indeed, you don't really distract undead at all. Kind of the perk of the job there, no? As for the IC? Find out IC. |
|
| Author: | maimed247 [ Tue, Apr 05 2011, 0:52 AM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (OOC) Mess :D |
//I did occly agree to what embraced is saying, basically to support ongoing rp.. If the undead catch her and return his belongings that's fine! I'm fine to continue with her knowing what the poem said through memory and using it in rp at a later time, other than that it's good to clear up the hips issue. |
|
| Author: | TormakSaber [ Tue, Apr 05 2011, 1:13 AM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (OOC) Mess :D |
You can agree to it, but the environment did not, it seems. Just because you both agree doesn't mean the world ignores what it would do for the sake of your personal story. |
|
| Author: | xXxSuShiKunxXx [ Fri, Apr 15 2011, 4:12 AM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (OOC) Mess :D |
// When your in Tarkuul, think of The sentience of Tarkuul as in itself a god. >.> However (At the moment)a god with enough sentience to only follow three rules. Rules have loopholes, some you should even fall back on if you must break other rules. That is all. Edit: Second thought, that may be slightly less relevant now that the rules are gone. >.> Or maybe not! Good luck. |
|
| Author: | Gravemaskin [ Fri, Apr 15 2011, 11:45 AM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (OOC) Mess :D |
Tarkuul only has the laws listed on the sign and the one that was posted here, but apparently up and disappered now. And last time i read them trying to find a good loophole to use, I found them to be quite loophole proof, even against my devilish tiefling's machinations. Mainly because they have a fallback rule. If conflict between two rules, the first rule overrides everything else. I must admit, the awesome laws is partly why I so adore Tarkuul. |
|
| Author: | xXxSuShiKunxXx [ Fri, Apr 15 2011, 21:23 PM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (OOC) Mess :D |
Same. >.> *Edited cause I felt it was metagamy |
|
| Author: | Mobile_Svensk [ Tue, Apr 26 2011, 15:31 PM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (OOC) Mess :D |
Err... Where are said rules by the way? I cannot find them. |
|
| Author: | xXxSuShiKunxXx [ Tue, Apr 26 2011, 21:26 PM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (OOC) Mess :D |
If you cannot find them, I am sure there is fairly good reason why. o.o (Though, I dont know why myself.) They were removed for... some reason... Right? >.> |
|
| Author: | Mishy moo [ Wed, Apr 27 2011, 4:11 AM ] |
| Post subject: | Re: (OOC) Mess :D |
Some times Valkin posts them up in the Castle in game, but they're on the wiki page I'm fairly certain, though these might be wrong as the Laws written there claim to not allow hiding in the shadows, where Tormak has said above it's not actually banned. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|