AMIA ARCHIVE
https://www.amiaworld.net/phpBB3/

Most Common Character Classes?
https://www.amiaworld.net/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=36136		 Page 1 of 2
Author:  joeymango29 [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 1:11 AM ]
Post subject:  Most Common Character Classes?
I'm sure theres been a topic with something like this before but when I do a search for it, it seems to bring up avery topic and it's mother so i'm starting a new one.

I'm formulating a thesis and a plan for a certain character. I need to know, what is the most common character class?
Author:  Wolfking6116 [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 1:12 AM ]
Post subject: 
I see wayyyyyy to many wizards/sorcs.
Author:  Eighty-One [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 1:19 AM ]
Post subject: 
Not sure about common, but one of the most uncommon that I've seen is Barbarian. I would put my bet of the most common on Wizzies/Sorcs, as has been said before.
Author:  BrainSplitter [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 1:20 AM ]
Post subject: 
Most Common = Rogue.

The sheer majority of builds have Rogue in them, whether it be as a primary class or merely to make that Wizard29 have a bit more AC.
Author:  Moridan_X [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 1:26 AM ]
Post subject: 
how do i select shadow dancer? cuz there are a hella lot of them either that or weapon masters
Author:  Bobo_Underhill [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 1:32 AM ]
Post subject: 
WonWon wrote:
Most Common = Rogue.

The sheer majority of builds have Rogue in them, whether it be as a primary class or merely to make that Wizard29 have a bit more AC.


Agreed. Everything from barbarians to paladins to wizards have 1d6 sneak attack.
Author:  TormakSaber [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 1:43 AM ]
Post subject: 
Rogue, then Fighter, then "who cares" is the list as I see it.
Author:  joeymango29 [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 1:47 AM ]
Post subject: 
It's all part of an economic plan Tormy. Thats why I care
Author:  Gunz [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 2:50 AM ]
Post subject: 
Rogue, no question. It's not the most "played" class, per say, but it is the class that most people take for UMD and such.
Author:  Galenson [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 2:54 AM ]
Post subject: 
I'm somewhat confused. Do you (Original Poster) mean "which class is used most in builds" or "which class do people take most levels in and RP the most?"


There's actually a crapload of barbarians surfacing (or resurfacing from the archivers) recently.
Author:  ainjyll [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 3:30 AM ]
Post subject: 
It's probably just my own experience, but I see a lot of bard sneaking into builds. Not the most RP'd build mind you, just one that I hear about more than a few builds having tucked away in a dark corner somewhere.
Author:  joeymango29 [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 3:50 AM ]
Post subject: 
Umm... I suppose its more along the lines of 'which are used most in builds'.
Author:  Yurell [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 4:38 AM ]
Post subject: 
Rogue. Almost every build has rogue in it for UMD / Tumble dump.
Author:  TormakSaber [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 4:39 AM ]
Post subject: 
Yes, followed by fighter for feats/proficiencies.
Author:  Gravemaskin [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 4:51 AM ]
Post subject: 
I'd say:
rogue
fighter
bard

in that order.
Author:  soundofastream [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 5:11 AM ]
Post subject: 
weapon master is also very common as is shadow dancer and monk.
Author:  joeymango29 [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 5:29 AM ]
Post subject: 
I'm not counting the prestige classes.
Author:  ILoveIceCream [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 5:36 AM ]
Post subject: 
rogue definatly is the most common, even if it isn't rped...I've seen things from paladins with rogue levels, sorcerers with rogue levels, and even...rogues with rogue levels...rogue is the most common
Author:  Sakkran [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 5:38 AM ]
Post subject: 
Well, to be quite fair, rogues come in all shapes, sizes, and methods. It can be anything from a socially-slick fast-talker, to a down-and-dirty fighter, to a cunning opportunist.
Author:  StandingBehindYou [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 5:44 AM ]
Post subject: 
Here's a totally unscientific survey of the base classes of people on AmiaA right now (counting characters multiple times):

Fighter: 16
Rogue: 12
Wizard: 8
Cleric: 6
Bard: 4
Monk: 4
Ranger: 4
Sorcerer: 3
Barbarian: 2
Paladin: 2
Druid: 1
Author:  joeymango29 [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 5:45 AM ]
Post subject: 
Thank you, that actually helps a lot.
Author:  Galenson [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 5:58 AM ]
Post subject: 
Blackguards are rather common aswell. Just 3 levels mind you.
Author:  QPR [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 9:40 AM ]
Post subject: 
The rarest classes I would definatly say is Barbarian and Ranger, atleast used as main classes. I dont think I have seen a single character with more than 20 barbarian or 25 Ranger levels.

Everyone have rogues in their builds, just because rogues are awesome to multiclass with. There are very few, if any classes, that dont go well with rogue. And thats the point of rogues anyway.
Author:  StandingBehindYou [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 9:51 AM ]
Post subject: 
Btw QPR, your signature says:

Malik Ibn La-Ahad - poop Painter

While that might be what you really meant, I think there's a chance it might not be.
Author:  Uncle-Opustus [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 15:44 PM ]
Post subject: 
Fighter.
Author:  The Cobbit [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 15:45 PM ]
Post subject: 
Harper Scout, of course.
Author:  IronAngel [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 16:12 PM ]
Post subject: 
This topic is pretty silly, to be honest. You want hard statistical data, yet you make a poll? 90% of people might say there are more people in Denmark than there are in China, but it doesn't make it so.

The question itself may be interesting and/or relevant, but the method by which you've chosen to collect the data is.. uh, nonsensical? :P
Author:  Acrid [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 16:50 PM ]
Post subject: 
The Cobbit wrote:
Harper Scout, of course.


Purple Dragon Knight.

But i was surprise there wasnt so much bard.
I'm very curious on the prestige class also.
Author:  Bobo_Underhill [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 16:52 PM ]
Post subject: 
QPR wrote:
The rarest classes I would definatly say is Barbarian and Ranger, atleast used as main classes. I dont think I have seen a single character with more than 20 barbarian or 25 Ranger levels.


I have a character with 23 barbarian levels, and Crunch is a pure barbarian. So, they do exist. and I know a ranger with 27 levels.
Author:  hendrack [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 17:19 PM ]
Post subject: 
Who needs more than 25 ranger levels?
Author:  The Cobbit [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 17:20 PM ]
Post subject: 
Bobo_Underhill wrote:
QPR wrote:
The rarest classes I would definatly say is Barbarian and Ranger, atleast used as main classes. I dont think I have seen a single character with more than 20 barbarian or 25 Ranger levels.


I have a character with 23 barbarian levels, and Crunch is a pure barbarian. So, they do exist. and I know a ranger with 27 levels.


I have a character with 23 Barbie levels. Worst build I ever had. He was only worth anything in the Bareknuckle Brawls.

I would say it's more rare to see pure Fighter or pure Rogue builds, though I did have a 25 Fighter and a 21 Rogue back in the day.
Author:  hendrack [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 17:22 PM ]
Post subject: 
I have seen a Fighter30 once though. Probably needs 4 screenpages to scroll down the feats.
Author:  belgianbonzai [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 17:39 PM ]
Post subject: 
The Cobbit wrote:
I would say it's more rare to see pure Fighter or pure Rogue builds, though I did have a 25 Fighter and a 21 Rogue back in the day.


I've only seen one full rogue, can't remember her name though...
She used to play with Alchas a lot...
Author:  IronAngel [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 18:36 PM ]
Post subject: 
I think Gillaria was pure rogue for a good while, before she went Rogue/Wiz/AA?

Do you mean Clasah, Belgian? She, too, rebuilt several times AFAIK, but probably was rogue at some point. I can't for the life of me remember the player's log-in, which is a shame because he was a great guy and fun to argue with. He and Alchas played together a lot.
Author:  Uberuce [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 18:47 PM ]
Post subject: 
Yep, Clasah was a pure Rogue. Then, if memory serves, went scimmy STR-Ranger, the DEX-Ranger, then STR-base Rogue24/Ftr6, which kicked like a %*&$£!@ing mule since she had a Purity.
Author:  Lesquille [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 18:53 PM ]
Post subject: 
Zeral was a pure rogue, I think.
Author:  IronAngel [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 18:55 PM ]
Post subject: 
Sounds about right! Huh, I miss Clasah. KD-0079, he was!
Author:  QPR [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 20:02 PM ]
Post subject: 
StandingBehindYou wrote:
Btw QPR, your signature says:

Malik Ibn La-Ahad - poop Painter

While that might be what you really meant, I think there's a chance it might not be.


I know, and I wondered if it was Disco or some other mean spirited DM on a drunken rampage who changed it. And i thought it was awesome. Then i discovered the thread about word filter, and it was not as cool anymore, but still funny. Now it only says 'censored', which just is boring.

I'll update it one day. I want to update it one day. But not today.

On topic:
Well, my excuse is that I have only been here for two months, and during that time, I have not seen any of those I mentioned. And true, not pure rogue or fighter either. Pure classes in general are rare.
Author:  Wolfking6116 [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 20:03 PM ]
Post subject: 
I play a pure rogue. >.>
Author:  Yossarin [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 20:55 PM ]
Post subject: 
We once discussed an idea of special benefits for pure class builds, but I think it got scrapped for some good reason somewhere along the way. Probably because some classes are cool as pure builds (bards), and others just make people sad (like ranger or rogue, I guess. Or Paladin, because you need that 1 level of either rogue or sorceror, naturally.)
Author:  TormakSaber [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 21:43 PM ]
Post subject: 
Uberuce wrote:
Yep, Clasah was a pure Rogue. Then, if memory serves, went scimmy STR-Ranger, the DEX-Ranger, then STR-base Rogue24/Ftr6, which kicked like a %*&$£!@ing mule since she had a Purity.


She ended on a STR ranger 25/fighter 4/bard 1, iirc.
Author:  xordae [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 21:45 PM ]
Post subject: 
Pure Rogue here too. Well, never got past 28. But he's tough as nails and can tank the Abyss with a little support (and no shield).

Also got a pure Paladin around the same level and he's very much a strong character. You don't need to multiclass it. Especially not since CL is an important factor for a Pala, too.
Author:  Yurell [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 22:23 PM ]
Post subject: 
xordae wrote:
Pure Rogue here too. Well, never got past 28. But he's tough as nails and can tank the Abyss with a little support (and no shield).

Also got a pure Paladin around the same level and he's very much a strong character. You don't need to multiclass it. Especially not since CL is an important factor for a Pala, too.


You can get away with most pureclasses.
Author:  Really Evil Pigeon [ Wed, Mar 11 2009, 23:35 PM ]
Post subject: 
well now looking back on it thats why Alu was sucha monster back then.. people were sucky pure classes (so was Alu) I love seeing how amia changed.. I remeber a certain someone calling all of vandree powerbuilds with there pure clerics and sorcerers

these days it's all blackguard 2, rogue 2, bard 1, and weaponmaster 7 (FTL)

And who needs ranger levels past 1.
Author:  Shade of Blue [ Thu, Mar 12 2009, 18:00 PM ]
Post subject: 
Really Evil Pigeon wrote:
And who needs ranger levels past 1.



:cry:
Author:  Carter [ Thu, Mar 12 2009, 18:31 PM ]
Post subject: 
Str-based ranger is a damn good build, actually.

And I miss the pure-class days. Valafein used to be able to kick ass with his totally unplanned build! Those were the days.

Sidenote: 16 WM is way better.
Author:  Mr Mago [ Thu, Mar 12 2009, 20:08 PM ]
Post subject: 
IronAngel wrote:
Sounds about right! Huh, I miss Clasah. KD-0079, he was!


She >.<


Played a pure dual-wielding lvl 30 Ranger.
Author:  Mr Mago [ Thu, Mar 12 2009, 20:09 PM ]
Post subject: 
Yossarin wrote:
We once discussed an idea of special benefits for pure class builds, but I think it got scrapped for some good reason somewhere along the way. Probably because some classes are cool as pure builds (bards), and others just make people sad (like ranger or rogue, I guess. Or Paladin, because you need that 1 level of either rogue or sorceror, naturally.)


Level 30 Paladin is hardcore status though.
Author:  Kjetta [ Thu, Mar 12 2009, 22:00 PM ]
Post subject: 
Yossarin wrote:
Or Paladin, because you need that 1 level of either rogue or sorceror, naturally.)


How cute is that? Yossarin thinks that paladhooms are 29 Paladin/1 Sorc. :lol:
Author:  The Cobbit [ Thu, Mar 12 2009, 22:02 PM ]
Post subject: 
Of course, every paladin needs to take that one level of sorc for their own little pixie familiar.
Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/